Side-by-Side Comparison · 2026

Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody: Full Comparison (2026)

Cursor is the ai-first code editor for pair programming with llms. Sourcegraph Cody is ai coding assistant with full codebase context (enterprise focus). Use the breakdown below to find the right fit for your needs.

Cursor

Anysphere

Freemium
vs

Sourcegraph Cody

Sourcegraph

Enterprise
This page presents factual information sourced from publicly available vendor documentation and product pages. AIHub does not endorse either product. The right tool depends on your specific use case, team, and requirements — we recommend evaluating both tools directly before making a decision.

Side-by-Side Overview

Pricing Model
Cursor: FreemiumSourcegraph Cody: Enterprise
API Access
Cursor: Not availableSourcegraph Cody: Not available
Platforms
Cursor: macOS, Windows, LinuxSourcegraph Cody: Web
Integrations
Cursor: 6 integrationsSourcegraph Cody: —
Vendor
Cursor: AnysphereSourcegraph Cody: Sourcegraph
Category
Cursor: Code AssistanceSourcegraph Cody: Code Assistance
Launch
Cursor: Mar 2023Sourcegraph Cody: —

About Cursor

Cursor is a fork of VS Code with native AI capabilities. Offers chat-based code editing, multi-file context awareness, and the ability to apply AI edits across your codebase.

Designed For

  • Large codebase refactoring
  • Chat-driven development
  • Code review
  • Bug fixing
Full Cursor details

About Sourcegraph Cody

Sourcegraph Cody uses Sourcegraph's code intelligence to provide AI assistance with complete understanding of your entire codebase. Sourcegraph ended Cody Free, Pro and Enterprise Starter on 23 July 2025 (new sign-ups stopped on 25 June 2025) and named Amp as the successor for individual developers. Cody Enterprise was not affected, and the product now focuses on enterprise deployments with multi-model choice (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini).

Designed For

  • Large codebase navigation
  • Code explanation
  • Enterprise onboarding
  • Refactoring at scale
Full Sourcegraph Cody details

Strengths & Limitations

Cursor

Strengths

  • Full codebase context
  • Multi-file edits
  • VS Code compatible

Limitations

  • Subscription required for best models
  • Learning curve

Sourcegraph Cody

Strengths

  • Full codebase context via Sourcegraph
  • Multi-model choice
  • Enterprise security
  • Cross-repository search

Limitations

  • No free or individual tier (Cody Free and Pro ended 23 July 2025)
  • Requires Sourcegraph license
  • Complexity for small teams

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Cursor and Sourcegraph Cody?

Cursor is the ai-first code editor for pair programming with llms, while Sourcegraph Cody is ai coding assistant with full codebase context (enterprise focus). Cursor is designed for Full-stack developers, AI-native coding; Sourcegraph Cody is designed for Code Assistance. The right fit depends on your specific requirements.

How do the pricing models compare?

Cursor is available under a Freemium model. Sourcegraph Cody is available under a Enterprise model. Cursor's entry tier starts at $0/mo. Always verify pricing on each vendor's official website as it may change.

What integrations does each tool support?

Cursor integrates with Git (built-in), GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket. Sourcegraph Cody integrates with various tools. Check each vendor's documentation for the full and current list.

How do I choose between Cursor and Sourcegraph Cody?

Consider your team's technical requirements, budget, existing tooling, and use case before deciding. We recommend signing up for free trials or demos of both tools where available, and consulting each vendor's documentation. AIHub provides this comparison for informational purposes only.